Imagine you are in a marketing function.
You want to predict the likelihood that a customer will engage with your campaigns in order to maximise campaign effectiveness. A good way of achieving this would be to predict the likelihood that a subscriber will engage (open, click-through and convert) through each channel (email, social, etc).
This is a job for Supervised Learning. With Supervised Learning we will be able to create a score for Engagement based on historic engagement data. You need historic data to train the model - 90 days of engagement data including Opens, Clicks, Unsubscribes, etc.
With the predicted Engagement score, you could personalise the email messages and campaigns each subscriber is sent to optimise the chance of positive engagement with that content.
Using predictive Engagement Scoring, a Salesforce customer in the travel industry was able to achieve a 66% drop in unsubscribe rate and a 13% revenue increase.
Your marketing team have been very successful in driving subscribers to your e-commerce site. You’ve got a load of great products and you want to ensure prospective customers can find the correct products quickly. A good way of achieving this would be to use personalisation to surface relevant product assortments throughout the shopper journey.
This looks very much like an Unsupervised Learning task. First we have insights into customers’ buying patterns, site browsing tendencies, relationships between search terms and products purchased. We couple this with information about the current shopper and their specific browsing histories.
The result of the model is personalised (predictive) product sorting. Products relevant to the customer are predictively served up resulting in a much smoother shopping experience.
Using AI powered Predictive Sort has been shown to result in a 9.1% increase in revenue per visitor and a 3.8% increase in conversion rates.
Your e-commerce sales are going well - but a large proposition of your business is via ‘assisted sales’. Luckily you have a lot of Opportunities through the good work the marketing team are doing - but with so many opportunities, where do you best spend your time? A good way of achieving this would be to predict a score for each Opportunity indicating the ‘quality’ - allowing you to concentrate on the best Opportunities in the given financial period.
This type of prediction modelling can be achieved with Supervised Learning. With Supervised learning we need training data - historical Opportunity data in this instance. Specifically, you need more than 200 Closed/Won Opportunities and at least 200 Closed/Lost Opportunities over the past 24 months.
The result of this model is a prioritised list of Opportunities - allowing the individual seller to maximise their revenue creation potential. In addition, because scoring can be used in forecasting, more objective sales forecasting can be achieved.
Using AI to indicate the optimum use of time has a positive impact on Opportunity close rates. One large Salesforce customer in the consumer goods space experienced a 48% increase in win rates by concentrating on the correct Opportunities.
Sales are going well - but your responsibility to your customers extends post sale. You have set up a self-service support channel and that’s going well but now service agents need to address the more challenging cases that remain. It would be great to learn what resolved previous similar cases so we can maximise agent productivity (and customer satisfaction).
Again, this is a great fit for Supervised learning. As you know by now, we need historic data. In this instance we need at least 1000 cases - at least 500 cases with knowledge base articles attached to them.
The result of this model is that agents get Article Recommendations to resolve a current case based on its similarity to previously resolved cases. Agents can save time searching for answers and customers can get their issues resolved promptly.
Using Salesforce AI powered solutions to assist agents, a large Salesforce company in the electronics space was able to save 5 hours per agent per week in productivity gains.